Wednesday, December 14, 2011

The Oath

When people become U.S. Citizens, they take this oath:


I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.


When people enlist in the active military service, they take this oath:


I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.


When people become police officers, they take an oath something like this:


I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution
of the United States and the constitution of this state, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ______ according to the best of my ability...

When I became an attorney (and every state requires a similar one), I took this oath:


I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney and counsellor at law to the best of my knowledge and ability.

Many readers of this have probably never taken any of these oaths, but if you are a citizen of the U.S., you should consider whether you are ethically bound to any less standard than someone who moves here from another country.  I'd say no.

Notice that none of these oaths say that they will do so, unless Congress passes a law to the contrary, or unless it will get me fired, or unless anything.  

It's time that all of us live up to our oath, actual or assumed, and defend our Constitution from its enemies.  Right now, most of its important enemies are in Washington DC.    

It's way past time, folks. 

Friday, December 9, 2011

Rats!

A week or so ago, I posted on the subject of cats, and how humans could learn a thing or two about what love really is from the furry, sometimes annoying felines.  Now it turns out that even rodents can teach us how to be better people.

The journal Science is reporting today that recent studies at the University of Chicago prove rats have empathy for the suffering of fellow rats and will act to alleviate it.    Researchers Jean Decety, Peggy Mason, and Inbal Bartal placed pairs of unrelated rats in cages for 2 weeks to get to know each other. They then put one of the rodents into a small plastic tube inside the cage.  The tube was fitted with a door that would open when it was bumped from the outside.  Not surprisingly, the trapped rats gave out ultrasonic distress calls, which, it turned out, were responded to by their free rat buddies.

In the studies, three-quarters of  rats with trapped cagemates learned how to open the door.  Only one rat in six without a trapped cagemate learned to do this, showing that rats whose friends were trapped were motivated to learn how to free them.

Moreover, each free rat who learned to open the door kept liberating its trapped cagemate again and again, as many times as its buddy was trapped, which researchers felt ruled out mere curiosity as the motivator of the free rats.  The rats freed their trapped friend even when the trapped animal exited into a separate cage, showing that the free rat wasn't only acting to get itself the reward of companionship.

And the rats freed trapped cagemates even when they had the option of bumping open an identical container to obtain chocolate, their favorite treat, demonstrating that their motivation to help was at least as strong as their desire for self gratification with food. In fact, half of the time they even shared their chocolate, leaving some for the trapped rat.

So, even RATS seem to be able to set aside their own selfish desires, show empathy for the suffering of others,  and help one of their own kind in distress.     I wonder when people will catch on.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

The Hard Truth

I don't go to a lot of movies in theaters.  The huge visuals and way too loud soundtracks are too much for me, so when I do go, the experience is always memorable, no matter what the movie is like.   One I especially remember is Titanic; the sequence where the ship is going down has been stuck like a sliver in my brain ever since.  That's the part where the people in the few lifeboats feverishly paddle away from those dying in the freezing water.   Watching that scene was, for me, like someone hitting me in the gut.  The visual image confirmed all too graphically that humans would turn away from their fellow men and women just that callously,  and later they would say they couldn't have done anything because they might also have died if they helped.

Of course, that had already been proven again and again.  There was WWII, when soldiers killed millions of innocent people because they were told to, and lots and lots of regular people stood by as a dictatorship took hold.  Then they watched their neighbors get herded into ghettos and concentration camps and many just went on with their lives, presumably making up some reason in their mind why they didn't need to do something.  Later they would say there was nothing they could have done because they might also have died if they tried to help.  Of course, there was similar silence when Japanese Americans were herded into internment camps, only the silence wasn't blamed on death, but "safety."

There was Vietnam, where officers gave, and soldiers followed, illegal orders to massacre civilians.  Some lost their minds later after it caught up with them what they did, but others probably told themselves that it was ok because they were just trying to stop Communism, or they were just following orders, and they might have died or gone to prison if they tried to oppose those orders.

And there's every day for the last 20 or so years, where we see reports of genocide, war, displacement, disease, abject poverty, and famine.  Bosnia.  Sudan.  Somalia.  Haiti.  And most of us--me included-have stood by and watched.  Were we on the phone every day to our representatives in Congress?  Not me.   Were we foregoing luxuries like cable or video games and sending every available dollar to help feed the people?  I didn't.  Were we protesting to demand changes in foreign policy or the end to the wars?  I haven't.   Joining the Peace Corp?  Not I.

And now, there's our government, which is gradually taking more and more liberties with human rights--ours and others'.   They've bombed villages full of civilians, and we allowed it, saying they 'must have been terrorists."  When images appear that show small children dead or with their limbs blown off, do we insist that it stop, loudly and persistently, because clearly these babies cannot be terrorists, or do we look away, and call them 'collateral damage?'  

When grave questions have arisen about the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing, or 9/11--questions that make clear the official story cannot possibly be true--do we demand action?  Or do we look away, afraid that if we learn the truth, it might force us to do something we don't want to do--like re-examine everything we've believed to be true?

When civil liberties like privacy of email or phone conversations, or freedom of speech is abridged in the name of  'security,'  have we screamed bloody murder and demanded it to end?  Or have we said, "well, that's not so bad if it keeps us safe, and anyway, it will only hurt people who are up to no good?"

As it has become clear that millions of Americans, who have lost their jobs in the last years due to globalization, the banking crisis, and so on, have we acted?  Have we compassionately sought to help by donating to food banks, or advocating for relief efforts, or helping people we might know personally?   Or, have we sought to blame them, or said, 'Phew!  Glad it's them and not me" and gone back to our Facebook? 

I know what I have done--not much, compared to what I could have done.  And, I'll bet there are people reading this right now who, if honest, would have to give the same answer.   And there are a couple of things I'm absolutely certain of, after living the life I've lived:

1)  The world is getting more and more harsh and wicked and out of control, not because of governments or shortages or global warming, or some other conveniently-out-of-our-control-excuses, but because people are showing less and less human decency and caring.  We are all too willing to close our eyes to injustice and hardship and suffering that's affecting someone else, but not us--yet;

2)  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.

The examples I've given show me that  we have the world we deserve.  We live in exactly, precisely the reality we've created with our own actions and inactions.  We tolerate horror, so we live in it.  We engage in division and hatred, and so we experience it in return.  We've made a world where things are a lot "fairer" if you're one kind of person or living in one kind of place, and much less fair if you're not.     The big problem for most  average Americans right now is that we are, for the first time, becoming the latter.  Not surprisingly, we're not liking it much.  Averting your eyes and paddling past the people in the water is a much better plan from the perspective of the lifeboat.

The problem is, the only way this cycle stops is if it stops for everyone.  If it's ok to paddle past anyone, eventually that anyone is going to be us.  If we close our eyes to injustice or unfairness against someone we don't like or don't know,  the standard is set.  And eventually, it will be us who are not liked or known.  If bombing babies is just 'collateral damage,' eventually it will be our babies.  The universe is cyclical.  What goes up comes down.  Tides that go out always come in.  And what we sow, eventually, we will reap.

This was the long way of saying something that has been said for a long time--Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.   That said, here's the hard truth:  If we expect anything to change, the first thing we have to change is us.

It's True

You're only paranoid if they're not really out to get you.  :-)


Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Peace on Earth

It's December, and the mad rush of people scurrying to buy this year's version of the Cabbage Patch Kids or Tickle Me Elmo is supposed to be upon us.   I've never understood the psychology of buying whatever is said to be the hottest new thing, and I've certainly never understood the buy now pay all year mentality of Christmas.  So the headlines about what a mad success the retail holidays are this year are perhaps a bit lost on me to begin with-but this year it's even more true.

On Black Friday this year, as is our custom, my family and I studiously avoided the mall.  We did a little grocery shopping, went to the park for a walk, and played games at home.  The thing that surprised me all day that day was how mild the crowds looked everywhere we drove past.  The mall had parking spots.  The Target store was downright civilized.  Traffic was reasonable all over our city.  Then we got home and I looked at the headlines of mad crowds and people pepper spraying each other and excellent retail sales, and I thought it must be a fluke. 

Since then, I've been shopping a couple of times.  Both times, stores weren't crowded; there were lots of sales, but fewer shoppers.   My own online retail business is distinctly average this year.  Not a lot worse, nor a lot better than previous, so I'm not buying that everyone is shopping on line.

Here's my theory.   I think that people may be getting it, finally.   There are always going to be those who get up at three in the morning to get an Xbox or a talking teddy bear, but I think people are shopping less this year.  Maybe the knowledge that the world is swirling round the cosmic bowl is causing a moment of reflection in American humanity.  Maybe people are seeing the stupidity of buying plastic crap with a plastic card and spending two or three months eating macaroni and plastic cheez food product to be able to pay for it.  Maybe the knowledge that our elected representatives have voted to be able to pick us up and toss us in the slammer for life by merely calling us a name is putting a damper on our acquisition instincts.  But I think people are getting it.  I certainly hope so.  After all, according to the story, Jesus was born in a stable, not a food court.

If we can't make it happen anywhere else maybe we can at least make it happen at the malls--Peace on Earth.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

The Arch

One of the strongest forms in architecture and engineering is the arch.  It's been done, in various ways, since the Roman Empire. 

The idea is that all the operative forces push against each other--side to side shear on each side pushes inward toward the middle of the arch, and the downward force of gravity presses down and out.  It makes a very strong portal. 

Interestingly, it also makes an incredibly strong political positioning strategy and way to divert forces around a central core of what someone really wants to get done.  Here's how it works.

Friday, December 2, 2011

I Feel Better

Recently, I have been facing a real problem.  I've found myself really really liking a Fox News contributor, Judge Andrew Napolitano.  I've even linked to a couple of his segments on this blog.  I've never liked a Fox News contributor before, and it's something of an existential crisis. 

Then, on top of that, I've found myself seriously thinking that the only candidate I might be able to vote for next year is Ron Paul, because of his stance on monetary policy, and especially the Federal Reserve.   Cognitive dissonance with my usually sort of left-leaning self. 

Today, I feel better.  My favorite person today is Jon Stewart.  Watch this .